codeforces#P750E. New Year and Old Subsequence
New Year and Old Subsequence
Description
A string t is called nice if a string "2017" occurs in t as a subsequence but a string "2016" doesn't occur in t as a subsequence. For example, strings "203434107" and "9220617" are nice, while strings "20016", "1234" and "20167" aren't nice.
The ugliness of a string is the minimum possible number of characters to remove, in order to obtain a nice string. If it's impossible to make a string nice by removing characters, its ugliness is - 1.
Limak has a string s of length n, with characters indexed 1 through n. He asks you q queries. In the i-th query you should compute and print the ugliness of a substring (continuous subsequence) of s starting at the index ai and ending at the index bi (inclusive).
The first line of the input contains two integers n and q (4 ≤ n ≤ 200 000, 1 ≤ q ≤ 200 000) — the length of the string s and the number of queries respectively.
The second line contains a string s of length n. Every character is one of digits '0'–'9'.
The i-th of next q lines contains two integers ai and bi (1 ≤ ai ≤ bi ≤ n), describing a substring in the i-th query.
For each query print the ugliness of the given substring.
Input
The first line of the input contains two integers n and q (4 ≤ n ≤ 200 000, 1 ≤ q ≤ 200 000) — the length of the string s and the number of queries respectively.
The second line contains a string s of length n. Every character is one of digits '0'–'9'.
The i-th of next q lines contains two integers ai and bi (1 ≤ ai ≤ bi ≤ n), describing a substring in the i-th query.
Output
For each query print the ugliness of the given substring.
Samples
8 3
20166766
1 8
1 7
2 8
4
3
-1
15 5
012016662091670
3 4
1 14
4 15
1 13
10 15
-1
2
1
-1
-1
4 2
1234
2 4
1 2
-1
-1
Note
In the first sample:
- In the first query, ugliness("20166766") = 4 because all four sixes must be removed.
- In the second query, ugliness("2016676") = 3 because all three sixes must be removed.
- In the third query, ugliness("0166766") = - 1 because it's impossible to remove some digits to get a nice string.
In the second sample:
- In the second query, ugliness("01201666209167") = 2. It's optimal to remove the first digit '2' and the last digit '6', what gives a string "010166620917", which is nice.
- In the third query, ugliness("016662091670") = 1. It's optimal to remove the last digit '6', what gives a nice string "01666209170".