Cycle sort
Description
You are given an array of $n$ positive integers $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$. You can perform the following operation any number of times: select several distinct indices $i_1, i_2, \dots, i_k$ ($1 \le i_j \le n$) and move the number standing at the position $i_1$ to the position $i_2$, the number at the position $i_2$ to the position $i_3$, ..., the number at the position $i_k$ to the position $i_1$. In other words, the operation cyclically shifts elements: $i_1 \to i_2 \to \ldots i_k \to i_1$.
For example, if you have $n=4$, an array $a_1=10, a_2=20, a_3=30, a_4=40$, and you choose three indices $i_1=2$, $i_2=1$, $i_3=4$, then the resulting array would become $a_1=20, a_2=40, a_3=30, a_4=10$.
Your goal is to make the array sorted in non-decreasing order with the minimum number of operations. The additional constraint is that the sum of cycle lengths over all operations should be less than or equal to a number $s$. If it's impossible to sort the array while satisfying that constraint, your solution should report that as well.
The first line of the input contains two integers $n$ and $s$ ($1 \leq n \leq 200\,000$, $0 \leq s \leq 200\,000$)—the number of elements in the array and the upper bound on the sum of cycle lengths.
The next line contains $n$ integers $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$—elements of the array ($1 \leq a_i \leq 10^9$).
If it's impossible to sort the array using cycles of total length not exceeding $s$, print a single number "-1" (quotes for clarity).
Otherwise, print a single number $q$— the minimum number of operations required to sort the array.
On the next $2 \cdot q$ lines print descriptions of operations in the order they are applied to the array. The description of $i$-th operation begins with a single line containing one integer $k$ ($1 \le k \le n$)—the length of the cycle (that is, the number of selected indices). The next line should contain $k$ distinct integers $i_1, i_2, \dots, i_k$ ($1 \le i_j \le n$)—the indices of the cycle.
The sum of lengths of these cycles should be less than or equal to $s$, and the array should be sorted after applying these $q$ operations.
If there are several possible answers with the optimal $q$, print any of them.
Input
The first line of the input contains two integers $n$ and $s$ ($1 \leq n \leq 200\,000$, $0 \leq s \leq 200\,000$)—the number of elements in the array and the upper bound on the sum of cycle lengths.
The next line contains $n$ integers $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$—elements of the array ($1 \leq a_i \leq 10^9$).
Output
If it's impossible to sort the array using cycles of total length not exceeding $s$, print a single number "-1" (quotes for clarity).
Otherwise, print a single number $q$— the minimum number of operations required to sort the array.
On the next $2 \cdot q$ lines print descriptions of operations in the order they are applied to the array. The description of $i$-th operation begins with a single line containing one integer $k$ ($1 \le k \le n$)—the length of the cycle (that is, the number of selected indices). The next line should contain $k$ distinct integers $i_1, i_2, \dots, i_k$ ($1 \le i_j \le n$)—the indices of the cycle.
The sum of lengths of these cycles should be less than or equal to $s$, and the array should be sorted after applying these $q$ operations.
If there are several possible answers with the optimal $q$, print any of them.
Samples
5 5
3 2 3 1 1
1
5
1 4 2 3 5
4 3
2 1 4 3
-1
2 0
2 2
0
Note
In the first example, it's also possible to sort the array with two operations of total length 5: first apply the cycle $1 \to 4 \to 1$ (of length 2), then apply the cycle $2 \to 3 \to 5 \to 2$ (of length 3). However, it would be wrong answer as you're asked to use the minimal possible number of operations, which is 1 in that case.
In the second example, it's possible to the sort the array with two cycles of total length 4 ($1 \to 2 \to 1$ and $3 \to 4 \to 3$). However, it's impossible to achieve the same using shorter cycles, which is required by $s=3$.
In the third example, the array is already sorted, so no operations are needed. Total length of empty set of cycles is considered to be zero.