#ABC240H. [ABC240Ex] Sequence of Substrings

[ABC240Ex] Sequence of Substrings

Score : 600600 points

Problem Statement

You are given a string S=s1s2sNS = s_1 s_2 \ldots s_N of length NN consisting of 00's and 11's.

Find the maximum integer KK such that there is a sequence of KK pairs of integers $\big((L_1, R_1), (L_2, R_2), \ldots, (L_K, R_K)\big)$ that satisfy all three conditions below.

  • 1LiRiN1 \leq L_i \leq R_i \leq N for each i=1,2,,Ki = 1, 2, \ldots, K.
  • Ri<Li+1R_i \lt L_{i+1} for i=1,2,,K1i = 1, 2, \ldots, K-1.
  • The string sLisLi+1sRis_{L_i}s_{L_i+1} \ldots s_{R_i} is strictly lexicographically smaller than the string sLi+1sLi+1+1sRi+1s_{L_{i+1}}s_{L_{i+1}+1}\ldots s_{R_{i+1}}.

Constraints

  • 1N2.5×1041 \leq N \leq 2.5 \times 10^4
  • NN is an integer.
  • SS is a string of length NN consisting of 00's and 11's.

Input

Input is given from Standard Input in the following format:

NN

SS

Output

Print the answer.

7
0101010
3

For K=3K = 3, one sequence satisfying the conditition is $(L_1, R_1) = (1, 1), (L_2, R_2) = (3, 5), (L_3, R_3) = (6, 7)$. Indeed, s1=0s_1 = 0 is strictly lexicographically smaller than s3s4s5=010s_3s_4s_5 = 010, and s3s4s5=010s_3s_4s_5 = 010 is strictly lexicographically smaller than s6s7=10s_6s_7 = 10. For K4K \geq 4, there is no sequence $\big((L_1, R_1), (L_2, R_2), \ldots, (L_K, R_K)\big)$ satisfying the condition.

30
000011001110101001011110001001
9