Shifts and Sorting
Description
Let's define a cyclic shift of some string $s$ as a transformation from $s_1 s_2 \dots s_{n-1} s_{n}$ into $s_{n} s_1 s_2 \dots s_{n-1}$. In other words, you take one last character $s_n$ and place it before the first character while moving all other characters to the right.
You are given a binary string $s$ (a string consisting of only 0-s and/or 1-s).
In one operation, you can choose any substring $s_l s_{l+1} \dots s_r$ ($1 \le l < r \le |s|$) and cyclically shift it. The cost of such operation is equal to $r - l + 1$ (or the length of the chosen substring).
You can perform the given operation any number of times. What is the minimum total cost to make $s$ sorted in non-descending order?
The first line contains a single integer $t$ ($1 \le t \le 10^4$) — the number of test cases.
The first and only line of each test case contains a binary string $s$ ($2 \le |s| \le 2 \cdot 10^5$; $s_i \in$ {0, 1}) — the string you need to sort.
Additional constraint on the input: the sum of lengths of strings over all test cases doesn't exceed $2 \cdot 10^5$.
For each test case, print the single integer — the minimum total cost to make string sorted using operation above any number of times.
Input
The first line contains a single integer $t$ ($1 \le t \le 10^4$) — the number of test cases.
The first and only line of each test case contains a binary string $s$ ($2 \le |s| \le 2 \cdot 10^5$; $s_i \in$ {0, 1}) — the string you need to sort.
Additional constraint on the input: the sum of lengths of strings over all test cases doesn't exceed $2 \cdot 10^5$.
Output
For each test case, print the single integer — the minimum total cost to make string sorted using operation above any number of times.
5
10
0000
11000
101011
01101001
2
0
9
5
11
Note
In the first test case, you can choose the whole string and perform a cyclic shift: 10 $\rightarrow$ 01. The length of the substring is $2$, so the cost is $2$.
In the second test case, the string is already sorted, so you don't need to perform any operations.
In the third test case, one of the optimal strategies is the next:
- choose substring $[1, 3]$: 11000 $\rightarrow$ 01100;
- choose substring $[2, 4]$: 01100 $\rightarrow$ 00110;
- choose substring $[3, 5]$: 00110 $\rightarrow$ 00011.